Comparing Design and Construct vs Construct Only Contracts
An architect working on a draft with a pencil and ruler. Design and construct vs Construct only

Comparing Design and Construct vs Construct Only Contracts

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways

It’s important to know the difference between Design and Construct vs Construct Only Contracts, whether you are carrying out a construction project or contracting/subcontracting to build one.

Construct Only Contracts: No Design Responsibility

A Construct Only Contract is a type of construction contract where the contractor is solely responsible for the construction phase of a project. Under this contract, the contractor is not involved in the design or planning stages, which are typically completed by the owner or a separate design consultant before the construction begins.

Here are some key features of a Construct Only Contract:

  1. Defined Scope of Work: In a Construct Only Contract, the contractor is provided with a complete set of plans and specifications by the owner. The scope of work is clearly defined, and the contractor is expected to build according to these plans.
  2. Focus on Construction: The contractor’s primary responsibility is to execute the construction phase. They are not involved in the design or decision-making processes related to the project’s concept or layout.
  3. Fixed Price or Lump Sum: Often, Construct Only Contracts are based on a fixed price or lump sum, where the contractor agrees to complete the construction for a set amount based on the provided plans and specifications.
  4. Limited Flexibility: Since the design is already completed before construction begins, there is limited flexibility for changes during the construction phase. Any changes to the design or scope of work usually require formal change orders and can affect the cost and timeline of the project.
  5. Risk Allocation: The contractor assumes the risks associated with the construction process, such as labor, materials, and adherence to the schedule. However, the risks associated with design errors or omissions typically remain with the owner or the design consultant.
  6. Quality and Compliance: The contractor is responsible for ensuring that the construction is carried out to the required quality standards and complies with relevant regulations and codes.

 

Construct Only Contracts are commonly used when the owner has a clear vision of the project and has already completed the design phase. This type of contract is suitable for projects where the scope is well-defined, and there is a low likelihood of significant changes during construction. It allows the owner to have greater control over the design, while the contractor focuses on efficiently executing the construction.

However, there is a “gap” risk, where the contractor is responsible for the construction of the works and the Principal’s designer is responsible for the design – this can mean that arguments occur about responsibility for defective works if it is unclear whether faulty design or construction was the cause.

In my experience

D&C Contract – Contractor takes design risk, no “gap”, less risk to Principal

Construct Only Contract – Principal engages Designer, Designer prepares design, Contractor follows the design. “Gap” risk and disputes about defects and design responsibility vs construction responsibility are common

Design and Construct Contracts: A One-Stop Shop

Design and construct contracts are a popular choice for projects where the owner wants a single point of responsibility for both the design and construction of the project. Under this type of contract, the contractor is responsible for both designing the project to meet the owner’s requirements and constructing it to the agreed specifications.

Design and Construct Contracts are mostly the same as Construct Only contracts. However, some additional clauses are added, including:

  • design obligations
  • fitness for purpose
  • professional indemnity insurance obligations.

In my experience… design and construct contracts can simplify the management of the project for the owner and can lead to efficiencies in the design and construction process. However, they also require the owner to clearly define their requirements at the outset, and they place a high level of responsibility on the contractor.

From the Contractor’s perspective… 

Design and Construct Contracts can be challenging, as they require a wide range of skills and capabilities. However, they also provide an opportunity to add value through innovative design and efficient construction methods.

Relevant Articles

Blaze Business & Legal

Ready to Take the Next Step?

Claim your FREE Structure Diagram or engage Blaze Business & Legal for a full structure analysis + help getting compliant

Use our unique StructureSAFE app to map your company structure and generate your free structure diagram, or apply for Blaze Business & Legal’s Comprehensive Business Structure Analysis if you need detailed legal and structural advice.

Blaze Business & Legal Logo - Structuring your construction business
Table of Contents
Blaze Business & Legal icon. Construction Business Structuring

Testimonials

“My construction business was slipping until a mate told us about Blaze Business & Legal. Now we’re kicking major goals!”

J. P. – Sunshine Coast Excavation Company

___

“We haven’t met any other lawyer or adviser who understands business structuring the way Rachelle Hare and Shannon Drew do.

Blaze Business & Legal fills a gap that business owners like me often don’t know is there. Accountants do our tax, lawyers draft a document if you ask for it, and banks expect your structure to be sorted before they will lend.

Rachelle and Shannon stepped back and looked at the whole structure of my business. They saw where things didn’t line up properly. They pointed out the risks. And they showed me how the structure was holding my business back from growing and getting a bank to lend us money. Then they worked with me and my Accountant to straighten it all out.”

Steve M, Civil Construction Owner, Brisbane

Blaze Business & Legal

StructureSAFE

Need help understanding your business structure?

Get your FREE Structure Diagram with our StructureSAFE app, or engage Blaze Business & Legal for a full Structure Analysis + help getting compliant.

Send Us A Message

About the Author
Rachelle Hare
Blaze Business & Legal | Managing Director
Senior Construction Lawyer and Strategic Business Adviser

Rachelle (pronounced “Rachel”) is a Construction Lawyer and Strategic Business Adviser with more than 25 years of experience across construction law, commercial advisory, risk and compliance, governance and business structuring. Her career includes acting in senior roles including Senior Legal Counsel, Senior Associate, Strategic Business Adviser and Commercial Manager at organisations such as Thiess, Laing O’Rourke, Acciona, Corrs Chambers Westgarth and McCullough Robertson. She has also worked for more than 10 years in government organisations and spent 6 years as a full-time Commercial Manager. Her experience spans construction, civil, infrastructure, mining, transport and commercial services.

At Blaze Business & Legal she advises construction businesses on structure, contracts, risk, governance and commercial control to strengthen business structure, governance and commercial decision-making while protecting her clients from risk.

Let’s Chat About How We Can Help You

  • Contact us to discuss how we can help you and your construction business
  • No-obligation quote for our services
  • We work to your budget and timeframes

Call Us

Email Us

enquiry@blazebusinessandlegal.com.au

Share With Your Network

Send Us a Message